usa logo

hunting fishing
resources
about usa
join usa
members only
contact us
trcp logo
The USA is a program of the TRCP and its AFL-CIO affiliated trade union partners.

Click here to learn about the TRCP and issues affecting our hunting and fishing heritage.
 
Hunting Feature

Muzzleloading in the Modern Age

M. D. Johnson

muzzle2_400 

 

Selection is huge these days—dollar menus, super stores, automotive options, and the list goes on and on. Hunters certainly aren’t spared the choices. In fact, we hunters have more choices available to us today than at any other time in history.

Blackpowder enthusiasts aren’t immune. Back in the day, we muzzleloaders had only one type of powder, a couple gun-makers, and three or four different projectiles. That’s changed. In the 2007 Cabela’s catalog alone, there were eight pages—eight pages—dedicated solely to muzzleloaders and accessories. Five of these pages were strictly firearms, with more than 20 various in-line options from which to choose. One entire page was projectiles—sabots, pure lead, hollow points, polymer-tipped, old school conical and round balls, pistol bullets. Red, green, black, blue, it was enough to make my head swim. Half a dozen brands of powder, none of which were traditional black powder.

It all made me wonder about the novice shooter. Where would they begin in terms of selecting an in-line rifle, powder, projectile, and accessories. The choices are daunting, to say the least. However, there are steps one can take that will simplify the entire process.

The Guns

All in-lines, regardless of make, model, or appearance, function in essentially the same manner. A source of ignition or flame is directed onto a propellant upon which rests a projectile. The resulting explosion and subsequent gases created push said projectile out of the barrel, past the muzzle, and downrange toward a target. That is it, period. Everything else pertaining to that particular firearm, with the exception perhaps of caliber, is based on visual appearance, personal preference, and ease of use. This, unfortunately, leads us full-circle back to square one.

The Calibers

Today’s muzzleloading hunter has, for all intents and purposes, three options in regards to caliber –the .45, the .50, and the .54. A quick, flat shooter, the .45 can be an excellent choice, though the lighter bullet weights don’t allow much room for shot placement errors. In experienced hands, the .45 is certainly capable of taking big game up to and including elk.

The .50-caliber is without question the most oft-seen rifle in the field. The manufacturers have long realized this popularity, and have responded by creating a vast selection of firearms and projectiles designed to meet the needs of all shooters, regardless of target. Loaded light, the .50 is easy on the shoulder, and with range work, extremely accurate. Pumped up, the caliber maintains the velocities and energies necessary to take any type of North American big game out to, some will say beyond, 200 yards. It’s my choice for the field personally, and I haven’t been disappointed.

My first whitetail was taken with a Thompson/Center Hawken in .54-caliber. So, too, was my wife’s first Roosevelt elk. Since that time, however, I haven’t fired the gun; neither has Julia Carol hers. Elk hunters may swear by the big .54’s heavy bullets and subsequent on-target performance, but I personally believe that most hunters would be better served by either a souped-up .45 or a .50-caliber.

The Ignition Systems

The choices here are three—No. 11 caps, 209 shotgun primers, or in the case of Connecticut Valley Arms’ innovative Electra, an electrical spark. My thoughts are that this is a matter of personal preference, as all three of these ignition systems are incredibly reliable in terms of putting fire to powder. Myself, I’ve switched everything to 209 primers. It’s simple, dependable, and all my guns are then on the proverbial same page should it be necessary to switch or swap in mid-hunt. The Powders 

In recent years, new players have entered the black powder field with any number of synthetic propellants, but it’s Hodgdon, with their Pyrodex and Triple Seven who appear to be getting the most at-bats. I shoot two 50-grain Pyrodex pellets in all of my rifles; some hunters opt for three pellets. It is said, and up for consideration, that loose (granulated) powder offers the most consistent chamber pressures and velocities, thus resulting in improved accuracy. Only time on the range, coupled with experimentation, will show this to be fact.

 

muzzle4_400 

The Projectiles

Here’s the stickler in choosing muzzleloading projectiles—two identical firearms may prove radically different from a performance standpoint when loaded with exactly the same bullet. What is the answer then? You must find which bullet, including weight, configuration, and sabot style, works best in your particular muzzleloader. 

My Knight Long Range Hunter, for instance, handles 290-grain boattails exceptionally well. My Remington Genesis and Optima Elite, however, have proved most accurate shooting 295-grain PowerBelt AeroTip Bullets over two 50-grain Pyrodex Pellets. Interestingly enough, there seems to be no change in point-of-impact when switching between 295-grain AeroTips and a like weight HP (hollow point) style PowerBelt. How do I know that? Range time.

 

The Bottom Line

The bottom line when it comes to choosing an in-line is relatively simple. Set a price point, determine how the firearm is to be used, do your homework on-line or via your friendly neighborhood sporting goods dealer, spend your folding money, and then, most importantly, set aside ample time on the range. Experimentation, particularly with bullets, is the key to achieving accuracy and consistency. And don’t forget that this is supposed to be enjoyable; it’s not work.

 
 
all materials copyright © 2007 union sportsmen's alliance
This Site Is Built By UNION Members For UNION Members.

BMA Media Group

BMA Painters Bug